NCCLAT 批准破产计划的规则,与RCIL一样,不能在批准后改变,即使债权人同意也不行。 NCLAT rules that approved insolvency plans, like RCIL’s, cannot be changed post-approval, even by agreeing creditors.

国家公司法上诉法庭(NCLAT)裁定,一旦债权人委员会根据印度破产法核准了解决计划,其财务结构——包括资金分配——即使同意的债权人也不得改变。 The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) ruled that once a resolution plan is approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) under India's insolvency law, its financial structure—including fund allocation—cannot be altered, even by assenting creditors. 在 " 依赖通信基础设施有限公司(CIL)案 " 中,NCLAT驳回了Baroda银行的上诉,认为批准后的变化,如重新分配不丹依赖贷款的收益,违反了核准的计划的约束性质,不能约束持异议的债权人。 In the Reliance Communications Infrastructure Ltd (RCIL) case, NCLAT dismissed Bank of Baroda’s appeal, upholding that post-approval changes, such as reallocating proceeds from the Reliance Bhutan loan, violate the binding nature of the approved plan and cannot bind dissenting creditors. 原计划于2021年8月获得CoC67.97%的批准,由Jio子公司接管RCIL。 The original plan, approved in August 2021 by 67.97% of the CoC, was for a Jio subsidiary to take over RCIL. 2023年以后,委员会试图修改资金分配,但被认为无效,从而加强了破产程序中核准的解决计划的最终性和法律确定性。 A later 2023 attempt by the CoC to modify fund distribution was deemed invalid, reinforcing the finality and legal certainty of approved resolution plans in insolvency proceedings.