诉讼称NCAA的资格规则不公平，允许部分职业球员重返大学，而限制像迭戈·帕维亚这样的球员。 A lawsuit claims the NCAA’s eligibility rules are unfair, allowing some pro players to return to college while restricting others like Diego Pavia.

由迪亚戈·帕维亚律师领导的联邦诉讼认为，NCAA的资格规则存在不一致，理由是该组织允许NBA选秀球员詹姆斯·纳吉在职业篮球生涯四年后带着四年资格重返贝勒大学。 A federal lawsuit led by Diego Pavia’s attorney argues the NCAA’s eligibility rules are inconsistent, citing the organization’s decision to allow NBA draft pick James Nnaji—after four years of professional basketball—to return to college at Baylor with four years of eligibility. 包括Pavia和其他26名大学足球运动员在内的原告宣称,NCAA在计算初中入学时间以获得资格方面的规则不公平地限制了像Pavia这样的运动员,Pavia正在进入第六个大学季节,同时允许专业运动员例外。 The plaintiffs, including Pavia and 26 other college football players, claim the NCAA’s rule counting junior college time toward eligibility unfairly restricts athletes like Pavia, who is in his sixth college season, while permitting exceptions for professional players. 田纳西州联邦法院正在审理此案,根据反托拉斯法对国家竞争管理局的规则提出质疑,并试图允许2026年和2027年的参与者参加竞争。 The case, ongoing in Tennessee federal court, challenges the NCAA’s rules under antitrust law and seeks to allow players to compete in 2026 and 2027.