印度孟买高等法院以缺乏法律依据为由,驳回了关于对Lavasa项目许可证进行CBI探测的请求。 India's Bombay High Court rejected a plea for a CBI probe into Lavasa project permits, citing lack of legal basis.

孟买高等法院驳回了一项公共利益诉讼,要求CBI调查据称非法批准PuneLavasa山丘站项目的案件,涉及全国大会党领导人Sharad Pawar、Supriya Sule和Ajit Pawar。 The Bombay High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation seeking a CBI probe into alleged illegal permissions for the Lavasa hill station project in Pune, involving NCP leaders Sharad Pawar, Supriya Sule, and Ajit Pawar. 法院裁定,请愿人Nansaheb Jadhav没有为指示警察在行使民事管辖权时登记第一份信息报告提供法律依据。 The court ruled that petitioner Nanasaheb Jadhav failed to show a legal basis for directing police to register a First Information Report while exercising civil jurisdiction. 该决定基于程序性理由,没有评估指控的有效性,包括2018年投诉后Pune警察不当影响和不作为的指控。 The decision, based on procedural grounds, does not evaluate the validity of the allegations, which include claims of undue influence and inaction by Pune police after a 2018 complaint. Sharad Pawar先前曾辩称这些主张是重复的。 Sharad Pawar had previously argued the claims were repetitive.