最高法院允许移民法官对特朗普时代的言论规则提出质疑, Supreme Court lets immigration judges challenge Trump-era speech rules, citing concerns over firing top officials.

美国最高法院暂时允许移民法官对限制他们在联邦法院公开演讲的特朗普时代政策提出质疑, The U.S. Supreme Court has temporarily allowed immigration judges to challenge a Trump-era policy restricting their public speeches in federal court, rejecting the administration’s request to block the case. 决定保留了下级法院的结论,即对监督联邦投诉制度的高级官员的解雇引起了人们对其诚信性的担忧。 The decision preserves a lower court’s finding that firings of top officials overseeing the federal complaint system raised concerns about its integrity. 虽然不是最后裁决,但法院的举动预示着要谨慎地扩大总统权力,解雇联邦雇员,特别是独立机构中的雇员。 While not a final ruling, the court’s move signals caution toward expanding presidential authority to fire federal employees, particularly those in independent agencies. 本案源于一个代表法官的工会在2020年提起的诉讼,该工会认为言论限制侵犯了他们的《第一修正案》权利。 The case stems from a 2020 lawsuit by a union representing judges who argue the speech restrictions violate their First Amendment rights. 结果可能影响其他联邦工人如何在法庭上对解雇或工作场所政策提出异议。 The outcome could affect how other federal workers challenge firings or workplace policies in court.