在涉及前官员罗查·坎图(Rocha Cantu)的问题引发改革的呼声后,公众对美国安全审查的担忧与日俱增。 Public concern grows over U.S. security vetting after issues involving former official Rocha Cantu, sparking calls for reform.

在涉及前情报官员Rocha Cantu(Rocha Cantu)的问题后, 公众日益关注美国政府对国家安全人员的审查程序。 Growing public concern over the U.S. government’s vetting process for national security personnel has intensified following issues involving former intelligence official Rocha Cantu. 批评者,包括两党监督成员和公民自由倡导者,说目前的规程缺乏透明度和充分的审查,有可能使背景可疑的个人获得敏感信息。 Critics, including bipartisan oversight members and civil liberties advocates, say current protocols lack transparency and sufficient scrutiny, risking sensitive information access by individuals with questionable backgrounds. 改革呼吁包括加强背景调查、更严格的清关标准以及改进监督,尽管政府坚持其程序是健全的。 Calls for reform include stronger background checks, stricter clearance standards, and improved oversight, though the government maintains its processes are robust. 官方尚未公布关于Rocha Cantu行为的官方调查结果, 但此事引发了关于平衡安全需求与问责的更广泛辩论。 No official findings have been released about Rocha Cantu’s conduct, but the incident has sparked broader debate on balancing security needs with accountability.