最高法院审理德里暴乱被告的保释请求,理由是缺乏证据和审判拖延。 Supreme Court hears bail plea of Delhi riots accused, citing lack of evidence and trial delays.

2025年12月2日,最高法院听取了活跃分子Umar Khalid、Sharjeel Imam和Gulfsisha Fatima的保释请求中的论点,他们根据UAPA在2020年德里骚乱案中被指控。 On December 2, 2025, the Supreme Court heard arguments in the bail pleas of activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, and Gulfisha Fatima, accused in the 2020 Delhi riots case under the UAPA. 他们的律师质疑检方关于泛印度阴谋和政权更迭的说法,指出指控表中没有这些说法,缺乏物证。 Their lawyers challenged the prosecution’s claims of a pan-India conspiracy and regime change, noting these are absent from the chargesheet and lack physical evidence. 他们列举了长时间的拖延审判,包括因文件遗失而暂停审理334天,并辩称继续拘留而不提出指控侵犯了权利。 They cited prolonged trial delays, including a 334-day pause due to missing documents, and argued that continued detention without framed charges violates rights. 德里警方坚持认为,暴力是预先策划的,与更广泛的阴谋有关。 The Delhi Police maintained the violence was pre-planned and linked to a broader conspiracy. 法院保留了判决权。 The court reserved judgment.