科罗拉多州法官关于无授权的移民逮捕的规则要求有可能的原因和逃难风险,援引美国公民自由联盟的诉讼。 A Colorado judge rules warrantless immigration arrests require probable cause and flight risk, citing ACLU lawsuit.

一名科罗拉多州联邦法官裁定,移民官员只有在有合理理由认为某人非法进入美国并有可能在发出逮捕令之前逃离美国时,才可进行无证逮捕。 A Colorado federal judge ruled that immigration officers may only make warrantless arrests if they have probable cause to believe a person is in the U.S. illegally and likely to flee before a warrant is issued. 这项裁决由R. Brooke Jackson法官作出,源于科罗拉多州公民自由联盟代表包括寻求庇护者在内的四人提起的诉讼,这些人在2025年执法行动中在没有逮捕证的情况下被逮捕。 The decision, from Judge R. Brooke Jackson, stems from a lawsuit by the ACLU of Colorado on behalf of four individuals, including asylum-seekers, who were arrested without warrants during a 2025 enforcement operation. 法官发现没有潜逃风险的依据,注意到社区关系密切,命令军官记录其推理。 The judge found no basis for flight risk, noting strong community ties, and ordered officers to document their reasoning. 国土安全部称该裁决为“激进分子”，并计划上诉，援引加州最高法院的类似判决。 The Department of Homeland Security called the ruling "activist" and plans to appeal, citing a similar Supreme Court decision in California. 本案是在对移民执法做法,包括种族貌相和移民归化局扩大存在等更广泛的关切之后发生的。 The case follows broader concerns over immigration enforcement practices, including racial profiling and expanded ICE presence.