Worcester的一名妇女在官员拒绝给予追溯性规划许可之后,将失去为残疾女儿建造的170,000英镑的延长期。 A woman in Worcester faces losing a £170,000 extension built for her disabled daughter after officials denied retroactive planning permission.

英国的一位女妇,在当局拒绝给予追溯性规划许可后,可能拆除为残疾女儿建造的170 000英镑的后院扩建房。 A Worcester, England, woman faces possible demolition of a £170,000 backyard extension built for her disabled daughter after authorities denied retrospective planning permission. 这种结构最初被批准用一个小的附属建筑取代一个车库,后来演变成一座两层独立的建筑,邻居声称它遮盖了房屋,封锁了阳光,破坏了该地区的特性。 Originally approved to replace a garage with a modest annexe, the structure evolved into a two-storey, standalone building that neighbors claim overshadows homes, blocks sunlight, and disrupts the area’s character. 该理事会裁定它不符合附件标准,缺乏对主楼的功能依赖,并对附近居民造成不可接受的影响。 The council ruled it fails to meet annexe criteria, lacks functional dependency on the main house, and creates an unacceptable impact on nearby residents. 房主Clair Birch说,她依赖一名计划者提交不正确的书面文件,认为她自6月以来就得到了批准。 The homeowner, Clair Birch, says she relied on a planner who submitted incorrect paperwork and believed she had approval since June. 她认为该建筑是女儿福祉所必须的,并否认该建筑是单独的住宅。 She maintains the build was necessary for her daughter’s well-being and denies the structure is a separate dwelling. 该案突出了个人需求与规划条例之间的紧张关系。 The case highlights tensions between personal needs and planning regulations.