一家新南威尔士州法院维持了23M的地产分割,有利于最年幼的儿子,给予女儿额外300K美元,以满足未得到满足的需要。 A NSW court upheld a $23M estate split favoring the youngest son, granting the daughter an extra $300K for unmet needs.

2025年新南威尔士州最高法院的一项裁决解决了关于悉尼男子2021年庄园的争端,他的农业财产价值超过2 300万美元,被转交给他最小的儿子,他的儿子仅支付了1 300万美元中的120万美元。 A 2025 NSW Supreme Court ruling addressed a dispute over a Sydney man’s 2021 estate, where his farming properties worth over $23 million were transferred to his youngest son, who paid only $1.2 million of a $13 million price. 年长儿童每人分期领取60万美元,对分配提出质疑,理由是他们的份额不足。 The elder children, each receiving $600,000 in installments, challenged the distribution, arguing their shares were inadequate. 法院认定大儿子有充足的供养,但以女儿未满足的需要为由,又判给女儿300 000美元。 The court found the elder son had adequate provision but awarded the daughter an additional $300,000, citing her unmet needs. 法官强调父亲有意保留农场,并指出兄弟姐妹在经济上是独立的。 The judge emphasized the father’s intent to preserve the farm and noted the elder siblings were financially independent. 法律专家强调,虽然父母可以照顾子女,但他们必须履行抚养受抚养人的道德义务,特别是在涉及大家庭资产的情况下。 Legal experts underscored that while parents can favor a child, they must meet a moral duty to support dependants, especially when large family assets are involved.