联邦上诉法院规定,如果官员认为疫苗有益于公共健康,即使疫苗主要保护个人,也可以授权使用疫苗。 A federal appeals court rules vaccines can be mandated if officials believe they benefit public health, even if they mainly protect individuals.

联邦上诉法院裁定,政府可以要求提供疫苗,即使疫苗主要是保护个人,但不能防止疾病传播,只要官员有理由相信疫苗能够促进公共健康。 A federal appeals court has ruled that the government can require vaccines even if they primarily protect the individual, not prevent disease spread, as long as officials reasonably believe they promote public health. 该决定以1905年的先例为基础,允许根据所认为的健康利益,而不仅仅是社区保护,来授权。 The decision, based on a 1905 precedent, allows mandates justified by perceived health benefits, not just community protection. 该裁决维持了洛杉矶学区的强制令，可能影响未来的公共卫生政策，尽管批评者警告称，这可能扩大政府对个人医疗选择的权力。 The ruling upholds a Los Angeles school district mandate and may influence future public health policies, though critics warn it could expand government power over personal medical choices.