新斯科舍省的法医因发布缺乏背景的不透明死亡审查建议而面临强烈反对，尽管有隐私限制。 Nova Scotia’s medical examiner faced backlash for releasing opaque death review recommendations lacking context, despite privacy constraints.

新斯科舍省首席医学检查官公布了两次死亡审查提出的不具约束力的建议,其中一次涉及儿童在公共泳池溺水,另一次涉及在押期间死亡,但因缺乏透明度而遭到批评。 Nova Scotia’s chief medical examiner released non-binding recommendations from two death reviews—one involving a child’s drowning at a public pool and another a death in custody—but faced criticism for lacking transparency. 虽然隐私法要求删除识别细节以保护家庭,但专家指出,由于缺乏事实背景,很难理解失败之处或评估改进池安全和健康记录管理等建议的价值。 While privacy laws required removal of identifying details to protect families, experts say the absence of factual context makes it hard to understand failures or assess the value of recommendations like improved pool safety and health record management. 批评者认为这一进程破坏了问责制,指出其他系统平衡隐私与公众使用权。 Critics argue the process undermines accountability, noting other systems balance privacy with public access. 虽然这些审查是向前迈出的一步,但对透明度和有意义的改革仍然感到关切。 Though the reviews represent a step forward, concerns remain about transparency and meaningful reform.