最高法院对班加罗尔的ISKCON寺庙所有权的上诉意见不一,但地位问题未解决。 Supreme Court splits on appeal over Bangalore ISKCON temple ownership, leaving status unsettled.

最高法院对质疑其2025年5月裁决的复议请愿作出了一项分裂裁决,该裁决确认Bengaluru ISKCON章根据《卡纳塔克社团法》拥有其寺庙建筑群的所有权。 The Supreme Court delivered a split decision on a review petition challenging its May 2025 ruling that affirmed the Bengaluru ISKCON chapter’s ownership of its temple complex under the Karnataka Societies Act. 包括法官J.K.Maheshwari和法官Augustine George Masih在内的两法官合议庭不同意:一是允许听审申请,二是驳回申请,认为原判决没有错误。 A two-judge bench, including Justices J.K. Maheshwari and Augustine George Masih, disagreed: one allowed the petition for a hearing, the other dismissed it, finding no error in the original judgment. 2025年5月的裁决推翻了2011年高等法院的一项支持孟买索赔要求的裁决,其依据是证明孟加拉自1978年以来独立的文件证据。 The May 2025 ruling had overturned a 2011 High Court decision that favored Mumbai’s claim, relying on documentary evidence showing Bengaluru’s independence since 1978. 此案已转交印度首席大法官进一步指导,但该寺庙的法律地位问题仍未解决。 The case has been referred to the Chief Justice of India for further direction, leaving the temple’s legal status unresolved.