参议院领导人敦促Roberts调查匿名法官对最高法院秘密紧急裁决的批评,特别是在Trump案件中。 Senate leaders urge Roberts to probe anonymous judge critiques of Supreme Court’s secretive emergency rulings, especially in Trump cases.

2025年11月,参议院和众议院司法领袖Chuck Grassley和Jim Jordan敦促首席大法官John Roberts调查联邦法官对最高法院紧急裁决的匿名批评,尤其是涉及Trump相关案件的批评。 In November 2025, Senate and House Judiciary leaders Chuck Grassley and Jim Jordan urged Chief Justice John Roberts to investigate anonymous criticisms from federal judges about the Supreme Court’s emergency rulings, particularly those involving Trump-related cases. 许多法官是共和党任命的法官,他们把法院的影子待审诉讼称为不透明、前后不一致和损害司法信誉的行为。 The judges, many of whom are Republican-appointed, described the Court’s shadow docket actions as opaque, inconsistent, and damaging to judicial credibility. 虽然立法者将批评说成是违反道德,但人们关注的焦点是最高法院越来越多地使用紧急命令(往往没有解释)推翻下级法院的裁决,从而引起关于透明度和公正性的问题。 While lawmakers framed the criticism as a breach of ethics, the underlying concern centers on the Supreme Court’s increasing use of emergency orders—often without explanation—to overturn lower court decisions, raising questions about transparency and impartiality.