德里法庭裁定“不采取强制措施”不会阻止刑事调查, A Delhi court ruled that "no coercive steps" doesn’t stop criminal investigations, clarifying probes can continue.

德里高等法院裁定,关于“不采取强制措施”的法院命令不会自动停止刑事调查,澄清这种语言主要保护人身自由,不象证据收集或账户冻结那样停止调查。 The Delhi High Court ruled that a court order stating "no coercive steps" does not automatically halt a criminal investigation, clarifying that such language primarily protects personal liberty and does not stop probes like evidence collection or account freezes. Anup Jairam Bhambhani法官强调,调查行动除非受到明确限制,否则可以继续进行,强调背景是过于僵化的解释。 Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani emphasized that investigative actions may continue unless explicitly restricted, stressing context over rigid interpretation. 在涉及商人Satya Prakash Bagla的案件中,这项裁决防止了对程序语言的曲解,否则可能会扰乱正在进行的调查。 The ruling, in a case involving businessman Satya Prakash Bagla, prevents misinterpretation of procedural language that could otherwise disrupt ongoing investigations.