Albanese政府的FOI改革面临对有争议的索赔要求的反弹和缺乏扩大保密的证据。 Albanese government’s FOI reforms face backlash over disputed claims and lack of evidence for expanded secrecy.

阿尔巴内斯政府提出的信息自由改革提案在公共廉政中心对关键主张提出争议后会受到审查,包括皇家委员会不建议修改内阁的保密性,因为专员要求增加透明度,这违背了这一提议。 The Albanese government’s proposed freedom of information reforms face scrutiny after the Centre for Public Integrity disputed key claims, including that a royal commission did not recommend changes to cabinet secrecy—contradicted by the commissioner’s call for greater transparency. 这些改革将扩大内阁豁免和禁止匿名请求,尽管政府声称存在国家安全威胁,但缺乏公开证据。 The reforms, which would expand cabinet exemptions and ban anonymous requests, lack public evidence of national security threats, despite government assertions. 包括影子检察长安德鲁·华莱士在内的批评者认为,这些变化破坏了透明度,要求采用基于技术的垃圾邮件过滤器。 Critics, including shadow attorney-general Andrew Wallace, argue the changes undermine transparency, calling for tech-based spam filters instead. 政府的法律理由受到质疑,而改革似乎不可能在没有跨党支持的情况下通过。 The government’s legal justification is questioned, and the reforms appear unlikely to pass without cross-party support.