员工使用人工智能来起草工作场所的通讯, 引发了对真实性和误导性证据的法律担忧. Employees using AI to draft workplace communications raises legal concerns over authenticity and misleading evidence.

雇员越来越多地使用像GPT这样的人工智能工具起草工作场所通信,包括对政策变化的反应和不当解雇要求的证据,引起法律和道德关切。 Employees are increasingly using AI tools like GPT to draft workplace communications, including responses to policy changes and evidence for wrongful dismissal claims, raising legal and ethical concerns. 在一个案例中,一名雇员利用大赦国际生成了一个冗长的、指控性的电子邮件,对返回办公室的任务提出质疑,其中充斥着无事实根据的指控。 In one case, an employee used AI to generate a lengthy, accusatory email questioning a return-to-office mandate, filled with unsubstantiated allegations. 法律专业人员报告说,在核实客户叙述的真实性方面日益面临挑战,因为大赦国际可以歪曲个人经历,扩大毫无根据的主张。 Legal professionals report growing challenges in verifying the authenticity of client narratives, as AI can distort personal experiences and amplify unfounded claims. 如果未经审查就提交受人工智能影响的通信，法院可能会面临误导性证据。 Courts may face misleading evidence if AI-influenced communications are submitted without scrutiny. 专家们敦促雇主制定政策,限制在与工作有关的通信中使用人工智能,并建议律师严格审查所有客户提供的证据,以获得人工智能的影响,确保索赔反映真实、未改变的经验。 Experts urge employers to establish policies restricting AI use in work-related communications and recommend that lawyers rigorously examine all client-provided evidence for AI influence to ensure claims reflect genuine, unaltered experiences.