随着各国重新定义可持续性,包括国防开支,在透明度差距和相互冲突的标准中,环境、社会和公司治理投资面临挑战。 ESG investing faces challenges as nations redefine sustainability, including defence spending, amid transparency gaps and conflicting standards.

负责任的投资预计到2030年全球将达到40万亿美元,但由于环境、社会和公司治理标准不一致、透明度薄弱以及优先事项相互冲突,因此面临越来越多的挑战。 Responsible investing, projected to reach $40 trillion globally by 2030, faces growing challenges due to inconsistent ESG standards, weak transparency, and conflicting priorities. 乌克兰战争促使德国和瑞典等国家将国防开支重新归类为可持续支出,而欧盟的欧洲再武器计划则提出8 000亿欧元的国防投资。 The war in Ukraine has prompted countries like Germany and Sweden to reclassify defence spending as sustainable, while the EU’s ReArm Europe plan proposes €800 billion in defence investment. 然而,欧盟尚未确认此类支出是否符合其可持续金融标准。 However, the EU has not confirmed whether such spending aligns with its sustainable finance criteria. 大型水坝等项目可能符合环境目标,但有害社区,许多基金对国防或双重用途技术缺乏明确披露。 Projects like large dams may meet environmental goals but harm communities, and many funds lack clear disclosures on defence or dual-use technologies. 促请投资者在不断演变的全球风险和不断变化的可持续性定义中要求提高透明度。 Investors are urged to demand greater transparency amid evolving global risks and shifting definitions of sustainability.