最高法院保护律师-当事人特权,限制调查获得法律咨询的机会,并要求司法监督。 Supreme Court protects attorney-client privilege, limiting investigations' access to legal advice and requiring judicial oversight.

最高法院裁定,调查机构不能传唤律师向客户提供法律咨询,但《Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam法》第132条的严格例外除外,这需要事先得到高级官员的批准并有明确的理由。 The Supreme Court ruled that investigating agencies cannot summon lawyers for legal advice given to clients, except under strict exceptions in Section 132 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, requiring prior approval from a senior officer and clear justification. 法院强调保护律师-客户特权,授权对数字装置的扣押和访问进行司法监督,并确保在数据提取过程中有律师和客户在场。 The court emphasized protecting attorney-client privilege, mandating judicial oversight for digital device seizures and access, and ensuring advocates and clients are present during data extraction. 这项裁决是针对向高级律师发出的ED传票而起的,加强了法律专业的独立性,防止滥用调查权力。 The decision, stemming from a suo motu case over ED summonses to senior lawyers, reinforces legal profession independence and prevents misuse of investigative powers.