最高法院将决定特朗普对加拿大、墨西哥和中国的关税是否超过紧急状态法规定的总统权力。 The Supreme Court will decide if Trump’s tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China exceed presidential power under emergency laws.

最高法院将听取特朗普总统根据1981年Mames & Moore先例提出的对来自加拿大、墨西哥和中国的进口品征收关税的上诉,1981年Mames & Moore先例根据《国际紧急经济权力法》维护了总统广泛的紧急权力。 The Supreme Court will hear President Trump’s appeal of tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, and China, relying on the 1981 Dames & Moore precedent that upheld broad presidential emergency powers under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. 虽然联邦巡回审判小组裁定的关税超出IEEPA的范围,但一名持不同意见者援引了支持行政当局使用关税作为外交政策杠杆的先例。 While a Federal Circuit panel ruled the tariffs exceed IEEPA’s scope, a dissent cited the precedent to support executive authority in using tariffs as foreign policy leverage. 本案源于约翰·罗伯茨首席大法官曾为威廉·雷恩奎斯特法官担任书记官的危机时期决定,检验总统在贸易和外交政策方面权力的限度。 The case, rooted in a crisis-era decision where Chief Justice John Roberts once clerked for Justice William Rehnquist, tests the limits of presidential power in trade and foreign policy.