一名法官驳回了一场大型iPhone App商店诉讼, 结束了对苹果App店收费的集体诉讼。 A judge dismissed a major iPhone app store lawsuit, ending a class action over Apple’s App Store fees.

奥克兰的一位联邦法官撤销了集体诉讼的认证, 指控苹果公司通过App店垄断iPhone App的销售, 结束了数百万用户的集体诉求。 A federal judge in Oakland has decertified a class action lawsuit accusing Apple of monopolizing iPhone app sales through its App Store, ending the collective claim by millions of users. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers法官推翻了她2024年的裁决, 引用了一个有缺陷的损害模型, 无法可靠地将账户与个人联系起来, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers reversed her 2024 decision, citing a flawed damage model that couldn’t reliably link accounts to individuals, including errors like confusing people with similar names and merging unrelated payment records. 这项裁决是根据苹果公司雇用的专家的调查结果作出的,破坏了原告证明广泛损害的能力,并要求单独处理个人索赔要求。 The ruling, based on findings from an Apple-hired expert, undermines the plaintiffs’ ability to prove widespread harm and requires individual claims to be pursued separately. 虽然所依据的指控依然存在,但该决定有效地制止了集体诉讼。 While the underlying allegations remain, the decision effectively halts the class action.