法律诉讼质疑特朗普在特区和波特兰部署国民警卫队的宪法和法律问题。 Lawsuits challenge Trump’s National Guard deployments in D.C. and Portland over constitutional and legal concerns.

正在进行的法庭听证会对特朗普总统向华盛顿特区和俄勒冈州波特兰部署国民警卫队部队提出质疑，因为行政权力和宪法限制存在法律纠纷。 Ongoing court hearings challenge President Trump’s deployment of National Guard troops to Washington, D.C., and Portland, Oregon, amid legal disputes over executive authority and constitutional limits. 在特区,尽管联邦数据显示暴力犯罪为30年之低,但一项诉讼寻求撤除根据犯罪紧急命令部署的2 200多名部队人员。 In D.C., a lawsuit seeks to remove over 2,200 troops deployed under a crime emergency order, despite federal data showing violent crime at a 30-year low. 一些州计划在11月30日前撤出其部队,除非延长。 Several states plan to withdraw their forces by November 30 unless extended. 联邦官员认为,国会授权部署,而反对派则称部署是违宪的超额部署。 Federal officials argue Congress authorized the deployment, while opponents call it an unconstitutional overreach. 波特兰的一位法官将很快对俄勒冈州的部署作出裁决,而芝加哥和西弗吉尼亚州也继续发生类似的法律战。 芝加哥和西弗吉尼亚州有一群人质疑国家为政治目的使用部队,声称这违反了州法。 A judge in Portland is expected to rule soon on the Oregon deployment, while similar legal battles continue in Chicago and West Virginia, where a group challenges the state’s use of troops for a political purpose, claiming it violates state law.