戴维森的一名居民反对续签 $71.39M 的偿债基金，认为它应该涵盖维护费用，而官员们则表示续签对学校安全至关重要。 A Davison resident opposes renewing a $71.39M sinking fund, arguing it should have covered maintenance, while officials say renewal is vital for school safety.

Davison居民Jane King正在敦促选民拒绝续延该区沉没基金, 声称五年前收到的7,139万美元原本应该用来支付长期被忽视的维修费用, Jane King, a Davison resident, is urging voters to reject the renewal of the district’s sinking fund, claiming the $71.39 million received five years ago should have covered long-neglected maintenance and avoided new projects like a $30 million performing arts center. 她辩称,更新基金将提高税收,并将非必要支出置于基本需求之上。 She argues that renewing the fund would raise taxes and prioritize non-essential spending over basic needs. 相反,督导员敦促进行“赞成”投票,强调该基金对于维持安全、功能学校和防止费用高昂的紧急修理至关重要,而更新被视为避免学生安全和教育质量长期风险的关键。 In contrast, the superintendent is urging a "yes" vote, stressing that the fund is vital for maintaining safe, functional schools and preventing costly emergency repairs, with the renewal seen as essential to avoid long-term risks to student safety and education quality.