Nnnandi Kanu在其恐怖主义审判中对法院管辖权提出质疑,以侵犯权利为由,随着审判准备工作的进行。 Nnamdi Kanu challenges court jurisdiction in his terrorism trial, citing rights violations, as trial prep proceeds.

被禁止的IPOB领导人Nnandi Kanu已提出法律质疑,质疑法院对其恐怖主义审判的管辖权,认为起诉违反宪法和人权标准。 Nnamdi Kanu, leader of the banned IPOB, has filed a legal challenge questioning the court’s jurisdiction in his terrorism trial, arguing the prosecution violates constitutional and human rights standards. 联邦高等法院由James Omotosho法官主持,裁定Kanu在医学上适合接受审判,并设定10月23日为他的辩护开始,定于10月22日进行私下磋商。 The Federal High Court, presided over by Justice James Omotosho, has ruled Kanu medically fit to stand trial and set October 23 for his defense to begin, with a private consultation scheduled for October 22. 检察官质疑Kanu的档案的真实性,要求他的首席律师予以确认。 Prosecutors have questioned the authenticity of Kanu’s filing, demanding confirmation from his lead lawyer. 与此同时，分离主义暴力受害者论坛反对释放卡努，敦促政府维护司法独立和正义。 Meanwhile, the Forum of Victims of Separatist Violence opposes Kanu’s release, urging the government to uphold judicial independence and justice. 与此相反,法治和问责倡导中心以及争取和平的族裔青年领袖倡导政治解决办法,以失败的镇压为借口,呼吁对话、包容和结构改革,以解决动乱的根源。 In contrast, the Rule of Law and Accountability Advocacy Centre and the Ethnic Youth Leaders for Peace advocate for a political solution, citing failed repression and calling for dialogue, inclusion, and structural reforms to address the root causes of unrest.