英国法院以证人威胁为由, 推迟裁决Epping的贝尔酒店是否可以继续收容寻求庇护者。 A UK court delays ruling on whether Epping’s Bell Hotel can continue housing asylum seekers, citing witness threats.

Epping森林区理事会正在等待高等法院就是否将Epping的Bell酒店与寻求庇护者住房隔绝作出决定,认为使用该酒店违反了规划规则并伤害了当地居民。 Epping Forest District Council awaits a High Court decision on whether to block the Bell Hotel in Epping from housing asylum seekers, arguing the use violates planning rules and harms local residents. 由Somani旅馆拥有的旅馆自2020年以来一直收容寻求庇护者,维持这一用途并不构成规划状况的实质性改变。 The hotel, owned by Somani Hotels, has hosted asylum seekers since 2020 and maintains the use does not constitute a material change in planning status. 内政部支持该酒店的立场，警告法律挑战可能会扰乱国家庇护住宿。 The Home Office supports the hotel’s position, warning legal challenges could disrupt national asylum accommodation. 为期三天的听讯结束,法官Mould先生以威胁证人为由推迟了书面裁决。 A three-day hearing concluded with Judge Mr Justice Mould postponing his written ruling, citing threats to witnesses. 上诉法院推翻了以前的一项临时禁令。 A prior temporary injunction was overturned by the Court of Appeal. 在公众关系紧张的情况下,案例中心以规划权与国家政策为主。 The case centers on planning authority versus national policy amid public tensions.