最高法院规定,在15 000名教师案件中,招聘纠纷必须提交特别法庭而不是高等法院处理。 Supreme Court rules that recruitment disputes must go to specialized tribunals, not High Courts, in 15,000 teacher case.

最高法院于 2025 年 10 月 16 日裁定，当存在像卡纳塔克邦行政法庭 （KSAT） 这样的专门法庭时，高等法院不能审理有关招聘纠纷的令状请愿书，驳回了涉及 15,000 名小学教师招聘案件的上诉。 The Supreme Court ruled on October 16, 2025, that High Courts cannot hear writ petitions over recruitment disputes when a specialized tribunal like the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal (KSAT) exists, dismissing appeals in a case involving 15,000 primary teacher recruits. 该决定维持了Karnataka高等法院的结论,即已婚的奥贝克妇女因父亲姓名的收入证书而被排除在外,必须通过KSAT而不是直接的司法干预寻求补救。 The decision upheld the Karnataka High Court’s finding that married OBC women excluded due to income certificates in their fathers’ names must seek redress through KSAT, not direct judicial intervention. 法院强调,第226条规定的宣告管辖权不应压倒既定的替代补救办法,特别是在例行服务事项上。 The Court emphasized that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 should not override established alternative remedies, especially in routine service matters. 该案件现在将由KSAT解决,预计KSAT将在六个月内采取行动。 The case will now be resolved by KSAT, which is expected to act within six months.