OpenAI在对Musk的诉讼中发出的广泛传票引发了对言论自由冷酷和破坏非营利使命的批评。 OpenAI’s broad subpoenas in its lawsuit against Musk spark criticism over chilling free speech and undermining nonprofit mission.

7名非盈利人士批评OpenAI向营利模式转变, 表示该公司在对Elon Musk的诉讼中发出广泛传票, 要求捐赠者提供资讯、Musk和Meta的Mark Zuckerberg通讯及治理细节, Seven nonprofits criticizing OpenAI’s shift to a for-profit model say the company issued broad subpoenas in its lawsuit against Elon Musk, demanding donor info, communications involving Musk and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg, and governance details—despite most groups having no direct link to the case. 包括公共公民罗伯特·魏斯曼(Robert Weissman)在内, 批评者称恐吓行动旨在压制异见, Critics, including Public Citizen’s Robert Weissman, call the move intimidation meant to silence dissent and chill free speech. OpenAI为传票辩护,认为这些传票是必要的法律辩护行动,声称其造福人类的使命保持不变,尽管反对者担心利润动机可能压倒其最初的非营利目标。 OpenAI defends the subpoenas as necessary legal defense actions, asserting its mission to benefit humanity remains intact, though opponents fear profit motives could override its original nonprofit goals. 这场法律斗争源于Musk声称OpenAI通过追求利润而违反了其使命,而OpenAI则反驳Musk试图控制AI创新的说法。 The legal battle stems from Musk’s claim that OpenAI violated its mission by pursuing profit, while OpenAI counters that Musk seeks to control AI innovation. 由于OpenAI的Joshua Achiam承认问责问题,内部问题已经浮出水面。 Internal concerns have surfaced, with OpenAI’s Joshua Achiam acknowledging accountability issues.