匹兹堡土地银行与克利夫兰的成功计划不同, 由于缺乏持续的资金, 努力出售空置房屋。 Pittsburgh’s land bank struggles to sell vacant homes due to lack of ongoing funding, unlike Cleveland’s successful program.

匹兹堡土地银行成立于2014年,与克利夫兰相比进展缓慢,克利夫兰自2009年以来拆除了近10 000处空置房产,并恢复了4 800万美元的税收收入。 Pittsburgh’s land bank, established in 2014, has made slow progress compared to Cleveland’s, which has demolished nearly 10,000 vacant properties since 2009 and restored $48 million in tax revenue. 匹兹堡的项目仅在2023年开始处理物业,并在2024年完成了8次销售,拥有62个物业,因为依赖一次性300万美元的赠款而没有持续的资金. Pittsburgh’s program only began processing properties in 2023 and completed eight sales in 2024, holding 62 properties, due to reliance on a one-time $3 million grant with no ongoing funding. 克利夫兰的成功取决于来自拖欠税金的稳定的国家资金,使得每年的营业额达到约3000万美元。 Cleveland’s success is driven by stable state funding from delinquent tax fees, enabling annual operations of about $30 million. 匹兹堡领导人在2026年寻求150万美元的资金,但面临宾夕法尼亚州预算僵局的拖延,这限制了在费用上涨和税收下降的情况下解决空置住房问题的努力。 Pittsburgh leaders seek $1.5 million in 2026 funding but face delays from Pennsylvania’s budget impasse, limiting efforts to combat vacant housing amid rising costs and declining tax revenue.