巴基斯坦最高法院在审查一项有争议的改变司法任命和任期的宪法修正案时质疑其自身的公正性。 Pakistan's Supreme Court questioned its own impartiality in reviewing a controversial constitutional amendment altering judicial appointments and tenure.

2025年10月13日, 巴基斯坦最高法院审理了对宪法第26修正案的质疑, 该修正案改革了司法任命,将首席大法官的任期定为三年,并成立了一个议会委员会来建议下一届正义与平等委员会。 On October 13, 2025, Pakistan’s Supreme Court heard challenges to the 26th Constitutional Amendment, which reformed judicial appointments, fixed the Chief Justice’s tenure at three years, and established a parliamentary committee to recommend the next CJP. 宪法法庭质疑它是否能够公正地对决定其本身组成的修正案作出裁决,引发关于是否需要由修正前法官组成“合议庭”的辩论。 A constitutional bench questioned whether it could impartially rule on the amendment that shaped its own composition, sparking debate over the need for a "full court" of pre-amendment judges. 法官对公正性表示关切,而请愿人则认为修正案损害了司法独立性,未经议会适当批准通过。 Justices raised concerns about impartiality, while petitioners argue the amendment undermines judicial independence and was passed without proper parliamentary approval. 法院尚未决定组成一个全体法官席,听审被延期。 The court has not yet decided on forming a full bench, and the hearing was adjourned.