30多名联邦法官警告最高法院的秘密紧急裁决,特别是那些支持特朗普的裁决,威胁着透明度和公众信任。 Over 30 federal judges warn Supreme Court’s secret emergency rulings, especially those backing Trump, threaten transparency and public trust.

30多名联邦法官对最高法院经常作出的不透明的紧急裁决 -- -- 被称为影子待审裁决 -- -- 表示震惊,特别是那些维护特朗普行政政策的法官,说这些裁决造成混乱,破坏下级法院权威,损害公众对司法部门的信任。 Over 30 federal judges have voiced alarm over the Supreme Court’s frequent, opaque emergency rulings—known as shadow docket decisions—particularly those upholding Trump administration policies, saying they create confusion, undermine lower court authority, and harm public trust in the judiciary. 许多法官,包括共和党和民主党任命者,报告说没有得到足够的指导,并称这些裁决是武断的和令人士气低落的。 Many judges, including both Republican and Democratic appointees, report receiving insufficient guidance and describe the rulings as arbitrary and demoralizing. 在23起总统权力案件中,有14起通过影子待审案件裁决,引起人们对司法透明度、问责制和政府各部门之间权力平衡的关切。 The criticism intensifies amid a pattern of the Court siding with Trump in 21 of 23 presidential power cases, 14 decided via the shadow docket, raising concerns about judicial transparency, accountability, and the balance of power between branches of government.