2025年10月11日,对19世纪女性伊丽莎白·麦格里进行的模拟重审,她被指控犯有谋杀罪,但被判无罪,认定是自卫和创伤. On October 11, 2025, a mock retrial of Elizabeth McGree, a 19th-century woman accused of murder after enduring abuse, resulted in a not-guilty verdict on murder, recognizing self-defense and trauma.

Newcastle大学法律系学生于2025年10月11日对1882年涉及Elizabeth McGree的案件进行模拟重审,该案涉及Elizabeth McGree, 因醉酒后谋杀Christian Renderup而被判有罪。 On October 11, 2025, University of Newcastle law students held a mock retrial of the 1882 case involving Elizabeth McGree, convicted of murdering Christian Renderup after a drunken assault. McGree与丈夫和女儿一起被指控在多年家庭虐待中声称自卫,并成为澳大利亚第一个在死刑案件中作证的妇女之一。 McGree, accused with her husband and daughter, claimed self-defense amid years of domestic abuse and became one of Australia’s first women to testify in a capital case. 她的上诉导致少见的全女女女女女校长陪审团,导致处决和监禁缓期执行;她在监禁期间生了第12个孩子。 Her appeal led to a rare all-female jury of matrons, resulting in a stay of execution and imprisonment; she gave birth to her 12th child while incarcerated. 在现代化的重现过程中,一个学生陪审团认定她没有谋杀罪,但犯有过失杀人罪,承认她在长期虐待情况下遭受创伤和自卫。 In the modernized reenactment, a student jury found her not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter, acknowledging trauma and self-defense in the context of prolonged abuse. 专家们强调了该案的持续相关性,强调了性别暴力和社会偏见如何影响司法结果,以及受害者的看法如何演变。 Experts emphasized the case’s ongoing relevance, highlighting how gendered violence and societal biases shape justice outcomes, and how perceptions of victims have evolved.