德里高等法院以管辖权争议为由,决定是否能够听取PFI对2022年UAPA禁令的质疑。 Delhi High Court to decide if it can hear PFI’s challenge to 2022 UAPA ban, citing jurisdictional dispute.

德里高等法院将裁定是否可以听取被取缔的PFI对2022年《UAPA》禁令提出的质疑,其论据以第226条和第227条的司法管辖权为中心,而第136条则认为必须直接向最高法院申诉。 The Delhi High Court will rule on whether it can hear a challenge by the banned PFI to a 2022 UAPA ban, with arguments centering on judicial jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 versus the need to go directly to the Supreme Court under Article 136. 政府辩称,阿联酋法庭的裁决不可复审,而PFI则认为,高等法院保留传令管辖权。 The government argues the UAPA Tribunal’s decision is not reviewable, while PFI contends the High Court retains writ jurisdiction. 提供的证据包括与ISIS和SIMI等团体的联系,关于资助恐怖主义的指控,以及煽动社区仇恨的努力。 Evidence presented includes links to groups like ISIS and SIMI, allegations of terrorism financing, and efforts to incite communal hatred. 其结果将塑造今后对国家安全禁令的挑战。 The outcome will shape future challenges to national security bans.