在加利福尼亚州AI法律辩论期间, OpenAI面对传票要求AI安全团体提供敏感数据的强烈反弹。 OpenAI faces backlash for subpoenas demanding sensitive data from AI safety groups during California’s AI law debate.

由三人组成的大赦国际非盈利政策Encode(Encode)指控OpenAI(OpenAI)在加利福尼亚州AI安全法辩论期间使用恐吓战术, 指称该公司发出广泛传票, 要求Encode(Encode)和其他团体提供敏感通讯和资金细节。 A three-person AI policy nonprofit, Encode, has accused OpenAI of using intimidation tactics during California’s AI safety law debate, alleging the company issued broad subpoenas demanding sensitive communications and funding details from Encode and another group. Encode否认与Elon Musk有联系, OpenAI暗示Eron Musk可能资助批评者, 并将传票称为报复。 Encode denied ties to Elon Musk, whom OpenAI has implied may fund critics, and called the subpoenas retaliatory. OpenAI为这一行动辩护,称其为确保透明度的标准法律程序,并列举了潜在的利益冲突。 OpenAI defended the move as standard legal procedure to ensure transparency, citing potential conflicts of interest. 这些指控受到前OpenAI公司雇员和AI安全倡导者的批评,他们警告有关行动可能会破坏民主言论和公司在监管方面的影响力。 The allegations have drawn criticism from former OpenAI employees and AI safety advocates, who warn the actions could undermine democratic discourse and corporate influence in regulation. OpenAI没有作出公开答复。 OpenAI has not publicly responded.