加利福尼亚州反生命中心以言论自由为由,反对州禁止堕胎药丸逆转要求。 California pro-life centers fight state ban on abortion pill reversal claims, citing free speech rights.

加利福尼亚州的支持生命的怀孕中心正在挑战2023年总检察长罗布·邦塔的诉讼, 控告他们对堕胎药丸逆转 (APR) 的误导性说法, Pro-life pregnancy centers in California are challenging a 2023 lawsuit by Attorney General Rob Bonta, which accuses them of misleading claims about Abortion Pill Reversal (APR), a treatment using progesterone to counteract mifepristone. 这些中心认为，尽管美国妇产科医师学会引用证据不足，但该州试图规范他们的言论侵犯了第一修正案的权利，并声称 APR 在知情同意下是安全有效的。 The centers argue the state’s attempt to regulate their speech violates First Amendment rights, asserting APR is safe and effective with informed consent, despite the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists citing insufficient evidence. 第九巡回上诉法院听取了关于国家是否可以基于科学不确定性限制言论的论点,法官质疑将信息作为目标的合法性,而不是程序本身。 The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments over whether the state can restrict speech based on scientific uncertainty, with judges questioning the legality of targeting information rather than the procedure itself.