最高法院将决定特朗普利用紧急权力对加拿大、中国和墨西哥征收关税是否符合宪法。 The Supreme Court will decide if Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose tariffs on Canada, China, and Mexico was constitutional.

美国最高法院将听取关于特朗普总统使用《国际紧急经济权力法》(IEEPA)对来自加拿大、中国和墨西哥的货物征收关税是否符合宪法的争论。 The U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments this fall on whether President Trump’s use of the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to impose tariffs on goods from Canada, China, and Mexico was constitutional. 消费者观察者和其他法律专家认为,法律并不授权征收关税,给予总统这种权力违反了三权分立的原则,因为只有国会可以征税。 Consumer Watchdog and other legal experts argue the law does not authorize tariffs and that granting such power to the president violates the separation of powers, as only Congress can tax. 下级法院裁定关税超过总统权限, 该集团警告该关税让消费者花费近900亿美元。 Lower courts have ruled the tariffs exceed presidential authority, and the group warns the tariffs have cost consumers nearly $90 billion. 本案结合两个挑战,将决定行政部门是否可以未经国会批准,根据紧急权力征收关税。 The case, combining two challenges, will determine if the executive branch can impose tariffs under emergency powers without congressional approval.