印度阿拉哈巴德高等法院驳回了关于制定新法律以保护男子免遭虚假骚扰申诉的请求,认为现行法律已经足够而且不分性别。 India's Allahabad High Court rejected a petition for a new law to protect men from false harassment claims, saying existing laws are sufficient and gender-neutral.

Allahabad高等法院驳回了一项公共利益诉讼,该诉讼寻求一项新法律来保护男子免遭据称被离散的妻子骚扰,裁决请愿书缺乏事实依据,严重依赖新闻报道而不是具体证据。 The Allahabad High Court dismissed a Public Interest Litigation seeking a new law to protect men from alleged harassment by estranged wives, ruling the petition lacked factual basis and relied heavily on news reports rather than concrete evidence. 由首席法官Arun Bhansali和法官Kshitij Shailendra领导的法院指出,现行法律已经为不实指控提供了充分的补救办法,司法干预是没有根据的。 The court, led by Chief Justice Arun Bhansali and Justice Kshitij Shailendra, stated existing laws already provide adequate remedies for false accusations and that judicial intervention was unwarranted. 它强调存在不分性别的法律保护,为男子单独制定一部法律可能会损害妇女和儿童的平等以及现有的保障。 It emphasized that gender-neutral legal protections exist and that creating a separate law for men could undermine equality and existing safeguards for women and children. 这项决定强调了司法机构的立场,即这种政策事项应由立法机构而不是法院处理。 The decision underscores the judiciary’s stance that such policy matters should be addressed by the legislature, not the courts.