最高法院维持了2025年4月的裁决,即Balaji的保释后部长任命引起司法廉正问题,如果危及审判,可以撤销警告保释。 The Supreme Court upheld its April 2025 ruling that Balaji’s post-bail minister appointment raised judicial integrity concerns, warning bail could be revoked if it undermined the trial.

最高法院拒绝澄清其导致前泰米尔纳德邦部长V Senthil Balaji辞职的2025年4月命令,坚持其先前的立场,即保释后任命他为部长引起人们对司法廉正的关切。 The Supreme Court has declined to clarify its April 2025 order that led former Tamil Nadu minister V Senthil Balaji to resign, upholding its prior stance that his appointment as minister after bail raised concerns about judicial integrity. 虽然法院说,它在法律上没有禁止他担任公职,但它强调,如果他的作用破坏了审判,它可以撤销保释。 While the court stated it did not legally bar him from office, it emphasized it could revoke bail if his role undermined the trial. 由Surya Kant法官和Joymala Bagchi法官领导的法官席注意到Balaji在保释后迅速返回工作岗位,引起批评,并警告可能取消保释。 The bench, led by Justices Surya Kant and Joymala Bagchi, noted Balaji’s quick return to office post-bail prompted criticism and warned of potential bail cancellation. 法院还出于对影响的关切, 建议将高调的以现金换工作骗局审判转移到德里, The court also suggested shifting the high-profile cash-for-job scam trial to Delhi due to influence concerns, though it acknowledged Tamil Nadu’s objections. 在法院的立场明确之后,Balaji提出的澄清请求被撤回。 Balaji’s plea for clarification was withdrawn after the court’s position became clear.