德里高等法院否认取消保释，尽管有在线庆祝活动，理由是缺乏威胁证据。 Delhi High Court denies bail cancellation despite online celebrations, citing lack of proof of threats.

德里高等法院于2025年10月6日裁定:除非有明确证据表明存在具体威胁或恐吓,否则,为保释庆祝的社交媒体邮报不能作为取消的理由。 The Delhi High Court ruled on October 6, 2025, that social media posts celebrating bail do not justify cancellation unless there is clear evidence of specific threats or intimidation. Ravinder Dudja法官驳回了申诉人Zafeer Alam要求撤销对Manish的保释的申请,Manish是在一起入室盗窃案中被指控的。 他说,光靠网上庆祝,没有威胁意图的证据,不符合取消保释所需的高标准。 Justice Ravinder Dudeja dismissed a petition by complainant Zafeer Alam seeking to revoke bail for Manish, accused in a house trespass case, stating that online celebrations alone, without proof of intent to threaten, do not meet the high standard required for bail cancellation. 法院没有发现威胁的可信证据,注意到警方没有提出任何投诉,屏幕截图缺乏恐吓证据。 The court found no credible evidence of threats, noting no police complaint had been filed and screenshots lacked proof of intimidation. 它强调取消保释需要“非常有说服力和压倒性的情况”,而这里没有这种情况。 It emphasized that bail cancellation requires "very cogent and overwhelming circumstances," which were absent here.