联邦法院以缺乏历史先例为由,裁定邮局枪支禁令违宪。 A federal court ruled the ban on guns in post offices unconstitutional, citing lack of historical precedent.

联邦法院裁定,联邦禁止邮局携带火器的禁令违宪,称这项禁令缺乏历史先例,违反了《第二修正案》。 A federal court has ruled that the federal ban on carrying firearms in post offices is unconstitutional, stating it lacks historical precedent and violates the Second Amendment. 该决定由得克萨斯州法官Reed O ' Connor发布,适用于火器政策联盟和第二修正案基金会的成员,允许他们在邮局携带隐藏的火器。 The decision, issued by Judge Reed O’Connor in Texas, applies to members of the Firearms Policy Coalition and the Second Amendment Foundation, allowing them to carry concealed firearms in post offices. 法院强调,在“敏感地点”对枪支的限制必须以历史传统为基础,而政府未能证明这一点。 The court emphasized that restrictions on guns in "sensitive places" must be grounded in historical tradition, which the government failed to prove. 该裁决遵循佛罗里达州类似的决定,反映了根据历史先例支持枪支权利的更广泛的司法趋势。 The ruling follows similar decisions in Florida and reflects a broader judicial trend favoring gun rights based on historical precedent. 美国人 The U. S. The U.S. 邮政局和司法部没有作出评论。 Postal Service and Justice Department have not commented.