两名研究生在因批评加沙大学政策而被ICE拘留后提起诉讼,声称违反了第一修正案。 Two graduate students sued after being detained by ICE for criticizing university Gaza policies, claiming First Amendment violations.

纽约联邦上诉法院听取了两名研究生Rumeysa Ozturk和Mohsen Mahdawi在诉讼中的口头辩论。 他们声称,在批评美国大学关于加沙的政策后,他们于2025年3月和4月被ICE非法拘留。 A federal appeals court in New York heard oral arguments in lawsuits by two graduate students, Rumeysa Ozturk and Mohsen Mahdawi, who allege they were unlawfully detained by ICE in March and April 2025 after criticizing U.S. university policies on Gaza. Ozturk是Tufts博士生候选人,在一次辩论后,在一次视频突袭中被捕。 Mahdawi是哥伦比亚学生,完成入籍面谈,在积极活动后被拘留。 Ozturk, a Tufts doctoral candidate, was arrested in a videoed raid following an op-ed; Mahdawi, a Columbia student who completed his naturalization interview, was detained after activism. 在下级法院裁定其长期拘留违反了宪法权利之后,两人均获得保释。 Both were released on bail after lower courts ruled their prolonged detention violated constitutional rights. 联邦政府正在上诉,认为人身保护令状质疑必须等到移民诉讼结束。 The federal government is appealing, arguing habeas corpus challenges must wait until immigration proceedings end. 他们的律师辩称,因发表政治言论而拘留个人违反了《第一修正案》,使政府能够超越权限。 Their attorneys contend that detaining individuals for political speech violates the First Amendment and enables government overreach. 法院的裁决可以为移民执法和言论自由确立先例。 The court’s decision could set a precedent on immigration enforcement and free expression.