得克萨斯州法院衡量图书馆能否禁止公开书籍,质疑《第一修正案》获取公共图书馆材料的途径。 A Texas court weighs if libraries can ban explicit books, challenging First Amendment access to public library materials.

得克萨斯州联邦法院正在审查公共图书馆是否可以删除明确的书籍,质疑第五巡回法庭先前的裁决,即第一修正案不能保证获得政府资助的图书馆材料。 A federal court in Texas is reviewing whether public libraries can remove explicit books, challenging a prior Fifth Circuit ruling that the First Amendment doesn’t guarantee access to government-funded library materials. 该案是全国辩论的一部分,引发了最高法院的上诉,高等法院尚未决定是否审理此案。 The case, part of a national debate, has prompted a Supreme Court appeal, with the high court yet to decide if it will hear the case. 科罗拉多州类似的争端可能很快会到达第十巡回法院,有可能导致最高法院的复审。 A similar dispute in Colorado may soon reach the Tenth Circuit, potentially leading to a Supreme Court review. 结果可以确定国家如何监管图书馆内容的国家标准。 The outcome could set a national standard for how states regulate library content.