妻子的侮辱和拒绝与丈夫同住,导致因精神虐待和遗弃而维持了离婚。 A wife's insult and refusal to live with husband led to upheld divorce over mental cruelty and desertion.

Chhattisgarh高等法院维持了在妻子称丈夫为尊重其父母的“pet rat”(pet rat)之后给予丈夫的离婚令,并拒绝与她一起单独住在家里。 The Chhattisgarh High Court upheld a divorce decree granted to a husband after his wife called him a "paaltu chooha" (pet rat) for respecting his parents and refused to live with her in a separate home. 法院认为她的行为构成精神虐待,特别是根据印度共同家庭规范,并确认了家庭法院关于逃兵和残忍行为的裁决。 The court found her actions constituted mental cruelty, particularly under Indian joint family norms, and confirmed the family court’s ruling on desertion and cruelty. 妻子承认发出了一个信息,要求他离开父母,法院认为这是强迫性的。 The wife admitted sending a message demanding he leave his parents, which the court viewed as coercive. 尽管妻子声称受到忽视和感情伤害,但法院认为,她长期不在婚后家中,超过两年,超过了法定的遗弃标准。 Though the wife claimed neglect and emotional harm, the court found her prolonged absence from the marital home—over two years—met legal desertion criteria. 上诉被驳回,丈夫被命令为儿子支付5拉赫卢比的赡养费。 The appeal was dismissed, and the husband was ordered to pay Rs 5 lakh in alimony for their son.