一名联邦法官裁定FBI合法解雇前探员Peter Strzok, 罪名是关键文本, 维持公务员在工作场所的言语限制。 A federal judge ruled the FBI lawfully fired former agent Peter Strzok over critical texts, upholding workplace speech limits for public employees.

前联调局探员Peter Strzok在2018年的终止中失去了第一修正案的诉讼,一名联邦法官裁决联调局的决定是合法的,而不是对受保护的言论的报复。 Former FBI agent Peter Strzok has lost his First Amendment lawsuit over his 2018 termination, with a federal judge ruling the FBI’s decision was lawful and not retaliation for protected speech. 法院驳回了Strzok的主张,即批评当时的Candiate Donald Trump的私人短信侵犯了他的宪法权利,指出在政府工作场所进行的这种通信可能损害机构廉正和公众信任。 The court rejected Strzok’s claim that private text messages criticizing then-candidate Donald Trump violated his constitutional rights, stating such communications, made in a government workplace context, could undermine agency integrity and public trust. 法官还驳回了Strzok的论点,即先前的一项纪律协议――要求降职和60天停职――已经具有约束力,指出联邦调查局领导人保留了取消这项协议的酌处权。 The judge also dismissed Strzok’s argument that a prior disciplinary agreement—calling for a demotion and 60-day suspension—had become binding, noting the FBI leadership retained discretion to cancel it. 这项裁决确认政府有权执行工作场所标准和在联邦执法中保持公正,为公务员言论自由的限制开创先例。 The ruling affirms the government’s authority to enforce workplace standards and maintain impartiality in federal law enforcement, setting a precedent on the limits of free speech for public employees.