德里高等法院以CLAT-PG分数作为雇用律师的唯一依据,宣布NHAI规则无效,认为这不符合宪法。 Delhi High Court invalidates NHAI’s rule using CLAT-PG scores as sole basis for hiring lawyers, calling it unconstitutional.

德里高等法院废除了印度国家公路管理局(NHAI)的一项规则,该规则使CLAT-PG得分成为雇用律师的唯一依据,称其为武断和违宪。 The Delhi High Court has struck down a National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) rule that made CLAT-PG scores the sole basis for hiring lawyers, calling it arbitrary and unconstitutional. 法院在首席大法官Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya和法官Tushar Rao Gedela领导的一项裁决中说,CLAT-PG是为LL.M设计的。 The court, in a ruling led by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela, said CLAT-PG, designed for LL.M. 招生情况不适合评估公共部门工作所需的专业法律技能。 admissions, was not suited to assess professional legal skills needed for public sector jobs. 该决定以律师Shannu Baghel提出的公共利益诉讼为依据,强调完全依靠考试将有经验的律师排除在外,违反了第十四条和第十六条规定的平等和公平待遇原则。 The decision, based on a Public Interest Litigation by advocate Shannu Baghel, emphasized that relying solely on the exam excluded experienced lawyers and violated principles of equality and fair treatment under Articles 14 and 16. 法院认定,该测试的学术性质与国家人权研究所法律工作的实际要求之间没有合理联系。 The court found no rational link between the academic nature of the test and the practical demands of legal work at NHAI. 虽然国家人权独立协会认为这一过程是透明的,但法院拒绝了这一点,称招聘必须考虑到相关的专业资格和经验。 While NHAI had argued the process was transparent, the court rejected this, stating recruitment must consider relevant professional qualifications and experience. 裁决确保将来的聘用不完全取决于法律学校入学考试。 The ruling ensures future hiring will not depend exclusively on a law school entrance exam.