印度最高法院开始审理关于直接任命具有七年律师资格的地区法官的律师的质疑。 India's Supreme Court begins hearing challenges to direct appointment of lawyers with seven years’ bar experience as district judges.

最高法院由五名法官组成的宪法庭,由首席法官BR Gavai领导,于2025年9月23日开始审理一项宪法质疑,质疑具有七年宣传经验的司法官员是否有资格根据配额直接被任命为地区法官。 The Supreme Court’s five-judge Constitution Bench, led by Chief Justice BR Gavai, began hearing a constitutional challenge on September 23, 2025, over whether judicial officers with seven years of prior advocacy experience are eligible for direct appointment as district judges under the bar quota. 该案源自30份请愿书,侧重于解释《宪法》第233条,以及律师和司法服务合并经验是否符合7年要求。 The case, stemming from 30 petitions, focuses on interpreting Article 233 of the Constitution and whether combined bar and judicial service experience counts toward the seven-year requirement. 法院正在考虑是否应当在申请、任命或两者兼而有之地评估资格,并告诫不要作出可能允许最低限度律师做法符合资格的解释。 The court is considering whether eligibility should be assessed at application, appointment, or both, and cautioned against interpretations that could allow minimal bar practice to qualify. 其结果可以改变整个印度的司法招聘,解决人们对司法机构停滞和减员的关切。 The outcome could reshape judicial recruitment across India and address concerns over stagnation and attrition in the judiciary.