德里高等法院在撤销约40种草药的虚假主张后,让Patanjali保留广告口号。 Delhi High Court lets Patanjali keep ad slogan after removing false claim about 40 herbs.

德里高等法院允许Patanjali Ayurved继续使用“为什么定居于普通的Chyawanprash?” The Delhi High Court allowed Patanjali Ayurved to continue using "Why settle for ordinary Chyawanprash?" 删除了针对Dabur India产品的"40种草药"的标签. in ads after removing the reference to "40 herbs," which targeted Dabur India’s product. 法院根据《药品和化妆品法》裁定原索赔构成贬低,因为它意味着竞争产品的劣势。 The court ruled the original claim constituted disparagement under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, as it implied inferiority in rival products. 在允许某种比较广告的同时,法院禁止关于竞争者真实性或成分的具体的、误导性的陈述。 While permitting some comparative advertising, the court prohibited specific, misleading statements about competitors’ authenticity or ingredients. 该决定允许帕坦伽利使用一般的吹嘘，并指出知情的消费者不太可能被误导。 The decision allows Patanjali to use general puffery, noting informed consumers are unlikely to be misled. 裁决没有涉及有关草药数量或产品安全的更广泛主张。 The ruling does not address broader claims about herb counts or product safety.