Maharashtra的Maratha保留政策引发了对种姓资格的法律质疑;案件被重新分配给新的法官。 Maharashtra's Maratha reservation policy sparks legal challenge over caste eligibility; case reassigned to new bench.

孟买高等法院一庭法官在审理5份请愿书时回避了自己的意见,这些请愿书质疑马哈拉施特拉邦关于允许Marathas获得Kunbi种姓证书以获得保留福利的决定,没有提出任何理由。 A Bombay High Court division bench recused itself from hearing five petitions challenging Maharashtra’s decision to allow Marathas to obtain Kunbi caste certificates for reservation benefits, citing no reason. 由OBC团体提交的请愿书认为这一举动是任意的和违宪的,声称它破坏了既定的种姓等级,并可能破坏OBC的保留制度。 The petitions, filed by OBC groups, argue the move is arbitrary and unconstitutional, claiming it undermines established caste classifications and could disrupt the OBC reservation system. 这个政策是在Maratha活动家绝食后发布的, 允许Marathas在证明过去Kunbi身份后, The policy, issued after a Maratha activist’s hunger strike, permits Marathas with proof of past Kunbi identity to apply under the Hyderabad gazetteer. 这些案件现在将由首席法官Shree Chandrashekhar和Gautam Ankhad法官领导的新法官审理,可能对马哈拉施特拉省的保留资格产生影响。 The cases will now be heard by a new bench led by Chief Justice Shree Chandrashekhar and Justice Gautam Ankhad, with potential implications for reservation eligibility in Maharashtra.