美国法院裁定许多特朗普时代的关税违宪,对总统权力提出质疑。 U.S. court rules many Trump-era tariffs unconstitutional, challenging presidential authority.

美国国际贸易法院裁定,特朗普行政当局根据《国际紧急经济权力法》征收的大多数关税都不符合宪法,理由是行政权力被过度侵犯。 A U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that most tariffs imposed by the Trump administration under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act are unconstitutional, citing an overreach of executive authority. 这项裁决影响到加拿大、墨西哥和中国的关税,但排除了第232节和第301节的关税。 The ruling affects tariffs on Canada, Mexico, and China, but excludes those under Section 232 and Section 301. 特朗普政府对该裁决提出了上诉。 The Trump administration has appealed the decision. 一位联邦法官以管辖权问题为由, 驳回了加利福尼亚州对特朗普关税的诉讼, 尽管加利福尼亚州计划提出上诉。 Meanwhile, a federal judge dismissed California’s lawsuit against Trump's tariffs, citing jurisdiction issues, though California plans to appeal. 法律挑战可能导致最高法院作出关于总统关税权力的裁决。 The legal challenges could lead to a Supreme Court decision on presidential tariff authority.