巴基斯坦法官持不同意见,对军事法庭不公正地审判平民提出争辩,侵犯了宪法权利。 Pakistani justices dissent, arguing military courts unjustly try civilians, violating constitutional rights.

巴基斯坦最高法院的两名法官发表了反对意见,辩称在军事法庭审判平民是违宪的。 Two Supreme Court justices in Pakistan have issued a dissenting opinion, arguing that trying civilians in military courts is unconstitutional. 他们声称军事法庭对平民缺乏管辖权,无法提供适当的宪法保护。 They claim military courts lack jurisdiction over civilians and can't provide proper constitutional protections. 法官们批评维持这种做法的多数裁决,指出民事法院应处理恐怖主义案件,并建议解决根本的政治问题。 The justices criticize the majority ruling that upheld the practice, stating that civilian courts should handle terrorism cases, and suggest addressing underlying political issues instead.