司法部与1990年代的Microsoft案相似,因为它反对谷歌的垄断做法。 DOJ draws parallels to 1990s Microsoft case as it argues against Google's monopolistic practices.

正在审理的针对谷歌的反托拉斯案与1990年代的微软案平行,两者都涉及被控垄断做法的技术巨头。 The ongoing antitrust case against Google is drawing parallels to the 1990s Microsoft case, both involving tech giants accused of monopolistic practices. 与微软相似, 微软被发现将互联网探索者与Windows捆绑在一起, Google被控在搜索引擎中扼杀竞争。 Similar to Microsoft, which was found to have bundled Internet Explorer with Windows, Google is accused of stifling competition in search engines. 微软案开创了法律先例,导致内部遵守情况发生变化,但避免了分裂。 The Microsoft case set a legal precedent, resulting in internal compliance changes but avoiding a breakup. 这一先例正在影响Google案中的论点,司法部试图解决技术产业中类似的垄断行为。 This precedent is shaping the arguments in Google's case, with the DOJ seeking to address similar monopolistic behaviors in the tech industry.