最高法院审查一个案例,以宗教反对为由,对ACA的免费预防护理任务提出质疑。 The Supreme Court reviews a case challenging the ACA's mandate for free preventive care, citing religious objections.

美国最高法院正在审查Kennedy诉Braidwood Management一案,该案质疑《负担得起的护理法》(ACA)关于私人保险人免费提供预防性保健服务的要求。 The U.S. Supreme Court is reviewing a case, Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, that challenges the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) requirement for private insurers to cover preventive healthcare services for free. 一些得克萨斯州雇主认为这侵犯了他们的宗教权利,重点是艾滋病毒预防药物PREP的覆盖率。 A group of Texas employers argue this violates their religious rights, focusing on coverage for the HIV preventive drug PrEP. 反对《公平竞争法》规定的决定可能导致保险人拒绝为预防服务提供保险,增加自付费用,减少获得癌症筛查和心脏病药物等护理的机会。 A decision against the ACA provision could lead insurers to deny coverage for preventive services, increasing out-of-pocket costs and reducing access to care like cancer screenings and heart disease medications. 预计法院将在6月前作出裁决。 The court is expected to rule by June.